lainlives 1027fed668 Initial 1 week geleden
..
FunnyApp.aps 1027fed668 Initial 1 week geleden
FunnyApp.cpp 1027fed668 Initial 1 week geleden
FunnyApp.rc 1027fed668 Initial 1 week geleden
FunnyApp.sln 1027fed668 Initial 1 week geleden
FunnyApp.vcxproj 1027fed668 Initial 1 week geleden
FunnyApp.vcxproj.filters 1027fed668 Initial 1 week geleden
FunnyApp.vcxproj.user 1027fed668 Initial 1 week geleden
LICENSE 1027fed668 Initial 1 week geleden
README.md 1027fed668 Initial 1 week geleden
offreg.h 1027fed668 Initial 1 week geleden
offreg.lib 1027fed668 Initial 1 week geleden
resource.h 1027fed668 Initial 1 week geleden
windefend.idl 1027fed668 Initial 1 week geleden
windefend_c.c 1027fed668 Initial 1 week geleden
windefend_h.h 1027fed668 Initial 1 week geleden
windefend_s.c 1027fed668 Initial 1 week geleden

README.md

BlueHammer

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512

Repository hosting the bluehammer vulnerability

I'm just really wondering what was the math behind their decision, like you knew this was going to happen and you still did whatever you did ? Are they serious ?

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iHUEARYKAB0WIQRJTvAf/AWVhAKEeb7FFoRCS0/SbAUCac8VlgAKCRDFFoRCS0/S bK8pAP9CzNnH26FVVdHZWVyDvOIwuZ1np1dTv7T5YaVCjf4tiwD+MC4Ikq+/ywdD I7dabkH7iSZflULM+hGUOur0mnAg9Qw= =Enhh -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Edit : There are few bugs in the PoC that could prevent it from working, might fix them later.