lainlives 1027fed668 Initial hai 3 meses
..
FunnyApp.aps 1027fed668 Initial hai 3 meses
FunnyApp.cpp 1027fed668 Initial hai 3 meses
FunnyApp.rc 1027fed668 Initial hai 3 meses
FunnyApp.sln 1027fed668 Initial hai 3 meses
FunnyApp.vcxproj 1027fed668 Initial hai 3 meses
FunnyApp.vcxproj.filters 1027fed668 Initial hai 3 meses
FunnyApp.vcxproj.user 1027fed668 Initial hai 3 meses
LICENSE 1027fed668 Initial hai 3 meses
README.md 1027fed668 Initial hai 3 meses
offreg.h 1027fed668 Initial hai 3 meses
offreg.lib 1027fed668 Initial hai 3 meses
resource.h 1027fed668 Initial hai 3 meses
windefend.idl 1027fed668 Initial hai 3 meses
windefend_c.c 1027fed668 Initial hai 3 meses
windefend_h.h 1027fed668 Initial hai 3 meses
windefend_s.c 1027fed668 Initial hai 3 meses

README.md

BlueHammer

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512

Repository hosting the bluehammer vulnerability

I'm just really wondering what was the math behind their decision, like you knew this was going to happen and you still did whatever you did ? Are they serious ?

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iHUEARYKAB0WIQRJTvAf/AWVhAKEeb7FFoRCS0/SbAUCac8VlgAKCRDFFoRCS0/S bK8pAP9CzNnH26FVVdHZWVyDvOIwuZ1np1dTv7T5YaVCjf4tiwD+MC4Ikq+/ywdD I7dabkH7iSZflULM+hGUOur0mnAg9Qw= =Enhh -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Edit : There are few bugs in the PoC that could prevent it from working, might fix them later.